|
|||
|
|
|
|
Fine Prints: July, 2009 Jefferson, the American Mind and the Birth of America July 4 Close Encounters of the Feline Kind July 11 Three in One Sermon July 18 Superiority Complexes-Individual and Collective July 25
Jefferson, the American
Mind and the Birth of America
[The following was excerpted from a longer essay written
by John W. Whitehead, of the Rutherford Institute.] In June of 1776 the Second Continental Congress
appointed a committee to prepare "a Declaration of Independence." It
consisted of Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Roger Sherman, Robert
Livingston and Thomas Jefferson. The committee unanimously turned to
Jefferson to prepare a draft. Jefferson wrote the Declaration of
Independence in two weeks, standing at his desk. As he wrote to James
Madison in 1823, it was "not to find out new principles, or new
arguments, never before thought of; not merely to say things which had
never been said before; but to place before mankind the common sense of
the subject, in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent, and
to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take."
The Declaration of Independence was an expression of
what colonial America believed at the time. As Jefferson said, it
contained no new ideas. He merely put pen to paper in declaring what
people of that day were thinking. This is clearly set forth in the two
opening paragraphs: "When, in the Course of human events, it becomes
necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands, which have
connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the
earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of
Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind
requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the
separation." It also states: "We hold these truths to be
self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by
their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights,
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from
the consent of the governed,—That whenever any Form of Government
becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to
alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its
foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as
to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
In less than 200 words, Jefferson sums up with lucidity,
logic and eloquence the argument for the American Revolution, the
creation of a new political system and a universal philosophy for human
rights, not merely for Americans but for the world as well. These ideas
would later be translated into the basic institutions of the American
republic. Unfortunately, with the passage of time, the impact of
Jefferson’s words has greatly diminished. We seldom speak of lofty
ideals anymore. Sadly, the American mind that Jefferson once expressed
so eloquently has become consumed with the mundane. What is worse, the
revolutionary spirit that once blazed a path to freedom is rarely seen
anymore. Yet as we face the increasing reality of authoritarian
government both here and abroad, it is time to revisit America’s
fundamental principles. If not, the freedoms our forefathers so bravely
fought and died for may very well, like grains of sand, slip through our
fingers and be lost forever. John W. Whitehead, Founder and President, Rutherford Institute
Close Encounters of the Feline Kind
[The following Fine Print has been written especially for the
children. But adults are welcome to read it, as well. In fact, why not
read it to your children?] The park is built in a swamp. That’s why they have a
boardwalk. In really wet weather, much of the ground is under water. And
that day there was water everywhere. I’m kind of crazy, but I often read while I’m out
walking. Which means that I sometimes get pretty close to something
before I notice it. And that day, I looked up just in time to see some
kittens on the boardwalk in front of me. The only thing was, the kittens were kind of different.
They looked like kittens, but they were almost as big as small
cats and had really long legs. They both had gray-brown fur with black
spots all over. When they saw me, one ran down the boardwalk and out of
sight around the corner. The other kitten hissed, arched his back and
took a few steps backward. But he didn’t try to run away. Oh, I thought, these kittens must be bobcat
kittens. So I tried to get a look at the remaining kitten’s
tail—because bobcats have short, stubby tails. But he kept backing away,
hissing and baring his teeth. Just then the other kitten came back around the corner.
But he wasn’t by himself. He had brought his mother with him. She was
definitely bigger than I thought a bobcat should be. And much more tan. She seemed too small for a panther but too big for a bobcat. So I stood there just a moment, trying to catch a glimpse of her tail. A long tail would mean she was a panther. A short one would mean she was a bobcat. But she was standing right at the turn in the boardwalk, so I could see only her head and shoulders. One thing for sure: She was big enough that I didn’t want her getting mad at me for being close to her baby. So I started backing up, really slowly, always looking right into her eyes. She stood very still, looking at me and never blinking. I got the idea she didn’t like me. I walked backward until I rounded the next corner on the boardwalk. I suddenly noticed I had goosebumps all over my arms and neck! As I walked away, I kept glancing over my shoulder just to be sure I wasn’t being followed! At home, when I checked the Internet, I decided for sure that she was a big bobcat. And I’m also sure that the next time I walk in Lake Lotus Park, I’m going to be looking very carefully to see if that bobcat family might just be there again. Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor
Three in One Sermon
1. Last week I told about two bobcat kittens and their
mother on the boardwalk in Lake Lotus Park. From my perspective, Lake
Lotus Park is one of the best-kept secrets in the Orlando area. From
I-4, head west on State Road 414 (Maitland Blvd.). It’s the second right
after you go over State Road 434. Much of the park is on low-lying ground. When we get
sustained rain, it’s nothing but a swamp. That’s why there are a mile
and a half or two miles of boardwalks through swampland. And there’s an
enclosed gazebo that juts out over Lake Lotus. You can sit there in
solitude and just enjoy the ambiance of the natural surroundings. On Saturdays and Sundays, parking isn’t allowed in the
park itself. You have to leave your car in a parking area on Magnolia
Homes Road. You then catch a Disney-style shuttle to the park. On Monday
and Tuesday the park is closed. But Wednesday through Friday you can
drive in and park your car. I encourage all lovers of nature to check it
out. Here ends the first sermon. 2. Since I live only a mile from Lake Lotus Park, I
don’t drive there. I walk. One mile there. One mile back. Plus however
much I choose to walk around in the park. I wish I walked there even
more often than I do, because I always feel better afterward. As I get older and less tolerant of the jarring that
comes from jogging and sports, I find walking a pleasant alternative.
It’s also a great stress reliever. Especially when it’s done in an
idyllic setting. So if you aren’t into walking but think you might enjoy
it, I’d encourage you to give it a try. Here ends the second sermon. 3. When I walk from my home to Lake Lotus Park, I try to
"multi-task" along the way. As a self-directed "community service"
project, I always pick up the trash on the north side of SR 414, between
Eden Park Road and the entrance to the park. I carry a trash bag with me and try to snag at least
every major piece of litter on my way. I must say I try to look
carefully so I won’t miss anything. This is serious business, after all.
After emptying my trash into a bin in the park, and
after walking around on the boardwalks, I head back. But I’m always
amazed at how much litter I discover that I overlooked on my way there.
It’s surprising how many things are hidden from one direction but are
readily visible from another. Which reminds me of what happens when I read the Bible.
I may read a passage when I’m at one point in life, with one set of
thoughts running through my mind, and feel that I plumbed the depths of
the passage. But then I read it later, when different things are
going on in my life and different thoughts are rumbling through my head.
And suddenly I see things there I never noticed before. In short,
there’s always more to be discovered. Here ends the third sermon. Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor
Superiority Complexes-Individual and Collective
While in upstate New York three summers ago, Leonie and
I happened upon a local library that was selling off its seldom-read
books. Since the price was right––about 25 cents each––I succumbed. One of my prize buys was Roses in December, an
early-life memoir of author and journalist Frances Parkinson Keyes. Her
name meant nothing to me. Everything I knew about her before buying her
book I had learned from reading the dust cover. Frances Parkinson Keyes was born in the late 1800s. She
was a contemporary of my Grandma Coffin. Mrs. Keyes was born into
relative fame and wealth and married into even greater fame and wealth.
By contrast, my grandmother enjoyed neither fame nor wealth. But I
thought it might be interesting to learn a little of what life was like
for a young female in that era. And the book did, indeed, prove
informative. Mrs. Keyes received most of her education from elite
Boston schools. She was fluent in German and French while still an
elementary student. In high school she read––in the original
language––most of the Latin classics. She likewise read the English, French and German
classics. She rarely saw a painting by a master without being able to
identify the artist. She also had been blessed to travel and reside in
Europe, which had helped her develop a love of geography and history. It
also helped her to see herself and her own country in a more balanced
light. One of her observations particularly struck me: "It is natural for a privileged child to feel that the
setting and the way of life with which he is familiar is the best in the
world, whether this happens to be London or Lisbon, Persia or Paraguay,
or any locality in our own country. "It is probably a blessing if this feeling continues
through adult life, since it makes for a kind of contentment that can
come only with a personal sense of belonging to a certain region, quite
aside from the more impersonal, but equally strong, feeling of national
patriotism. "Certainly, in my case, I am never going to feel that
any other cities have all that Boston and Washington can offer me, or
that any countryside is as beautiful as the upper Connecticut Valley and
the corresponding parts of Virginia. "But when such a feeling results in the conviction that
it is only on one’s native or familiar heath that there are fine
people, lovely sights, and a well-ordered and pleasant way of living,
the consequences are disastrous; they breed intolerance,
misunderstanding, and often downright antagonism." Although talking here about geography and love of
country, Mrs. Keyes’ words struck home to me because they also apply to
denominationalism. As Adventists we have much to celebrate. We’re
"privileged children." We promote certain truths that are definitely
life-enhancing. But our joy at what we’ve discovered means we may
likewise fall prey to assuming that in our denomination alone can
one find true Christians, deep commitment and great love for God. We
then become prey to "intolerance, misunderstanding, and often downright
antagonism." Let’s appreciate what we have spiritually without
letting that happen. Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor | ||
|
|
|