|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Fine Prints: June, 2010 A Lasting Legacy June 5 A Little Truth Is a Dangerous Thing June 12 Right Time, Right Place--for Me, at Least June 19 Not Just When It's Convenient June 26
A Lasting Legacy
Recently I attended a seminar on writing one’s "ethical will." The
basic goal of an ethical will is to pass on to others the values,
stories and life lessons that played a major role in shaping who I am. Most people understand the need for a traditional will. It’s to
ensure that possessions are passed on to those we think deserve them or
would appreciate them. But the reality is, possessions with quantifiable
monetary value may not be our greatest assets. If I’ve lived a rags-to-riches life, the narrative of what enabled my
escape from poverty may be a more useful gift than the riches acquired.
And ensuring that our children know our family story may be highly
valued at some point, if not right now. In the seminar I sat next to a Jewish man who said that his
great-great-great-grandfather, a rabbi, delivered the Jewish eulogy at
Abraham Lincoln’s funeral (several clergy participated). His family
still has the script of what his ancestor said on that occasion. I would
certainly hope he makes sure that his children know about their forebear
and receive their own copy of the eulogy. In the Coffin family, our immigrant ancestor––Tristram
Coffin––arrived in Massachusetts from Devonshire, England, in 1642.
That’s a few generations back! A mere 150 years after Columbus
discovered the new world! Only 22 years after the arrival of the
Pilgrims! So our family roots go deep into U.S. soil. My sons need to
know that fact. And unless I take specific steps to ensure that they do,
a significant piece of Coffin family history could be lost. Remember, the seminar encouraged writing an "ethical will." So values
and how those values related to one’s life are an important component of
what should be shared. If fairness and justice are motivating principles
of my life, what did I do to make sure that those principles were lived
out? What impact did the living out of those values have on me? Was I
honored for my commitment? Did I lose a job at some point because I
stood for principle? Did I lose friends because of my commitment to
right? What did I do correctly and what would I like to be able to
rewrite from my personal history? Of course, one of the advantages of writing such a document is that
it’s likely to influence to some degree what people actually say about
me when I’m gone. So what would I want them to say? What would I want my
obituary to highlight? If there’s something I’d really like to have said about me when I’m
gone, the best way to ensure that it will be said is to make it a life
priority right now. Let’s say that I hope that people would describe me
as having been a friend to all, irrespective of their station in life.
Then I need to take that secret hope and very deliberately turn it
into a personal mission statement. The next step is to make sure that I
actually live out my mission. And if I do, there’s a pretty good chance
that my obituary will say exactly what I was hoping for. Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor
A Little Truth Is a Dangerous Thing
When I attended Newbold College in England, I often saw local signs that
contained some variation of the word "Pope." And they weren’t referring
to the head of the Roman Catholic Church. They were referring to
Alexander Pope (1688-1744), an English "essayist, critic, satirist, and
one of the greatest poets of the Enlightenment," who grew up not far
from where Newbold College stands today. One of Pope’s more famous sayings is: "A little learning is a
dangerous thing." Actually, the original statement continues: "Drink
deep, or taste not the Pierian spring: / There shallow draughts
intoxicate the brain, / And drinking largely sobers us again." Pope implies that our first introduction to an idea may leave us
besotted. But if we take time to delve deeply, our feet will find solid
ground once again. I would suggest that we could exchange the word
"truth" for the word "learning," and Pope’s wisdom would still stand. The other day I happened to mention that someone I knew had been
spiritually injured by the actions of others. However, my listener
assured me that others can’t injure us spiritually. Spiritual
injury is a choice we make. I countered with one of those "Yes
but No" replies. Yes, I readily agree that we do have some control over how we respond
to the spiritual slings and arrows that may be hurled our way or that we
bump into accidentally. I repeat, we do have some choice. And we
certainly should put forth effort to try to eliminate or minimize the
negative impact. We should seek to live in the positive despite what has
been done. But, no, spiritual injury isn’t just a choice. Spiritual
injury actually happens. Spiritual injury, even when resisted
heroically, can still come about because of the intensity of the
onslaught, because of the magnitude of the disillusionment, because of
the stature of the one/ones inflicting the pain. The children who were abused by unscrupulous Roman Catholic priests
were truly abused. Their lives were at times shattered––not
because they failed to appropriately "choose" not to be spiritually
injured but because they truly were injured. And adults aren’t
exempt from injury. The partial truth is that in certain contexts and to varying degrees
we can create a teflon exterior that allows spiritual barbs to
bounce off of us (at least those up to a certain magnitude and
experienced for a certain duration). But that is in no way a
universal truth that spiritual injury is purely a matter of choice.
Pope’s principle is critical: A little truth is a dangerous thing;
because if we lose sight of the big picture, that little truth will make
us very unsympathetic toward many who truly are wounded. Jesus said that if anyone causes one of the "little ones" to stumble,
it would be appropriate if a millstone were tied around his neck and he
were drowned. Jesus didn’t say that, if any of the little ones are so
wimpy that they get bent out of shape because of what’s been done to
them, they should have a millstone tied around their neck
and be drowned. And why didn’t He say that? Because spiritual injury isn’t just
a choice. Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor
Right Time, Right Place--for Me, at Least
I’d completed a hike around the boardwalk at Lake Lotus Park (on the north side of SR 414) when I happened upon Gary, one of the park rangers, who was shuttling people from the parking lot on the south side of SR 414, giving them a ride in the park’s Disney-like people-mover trailer. "We saw a bear as we came into the park," Gary told me. It’s on the right side of the road just before you get to the gate." A bear sounded exciting enough for me, so I made a beeline for the park entrance. "font-size: 9pt">When I arrived, Frank, another park ranger, was there with his camera. And, sure enough, there was the bear, not more than a hundred feet from the road. Frank estimated that she weighed about two hundred and twenty-five pounds. For the next fifteen minutes, the two rangers, some ten people on the trailer and I watched the bear and her two-year-old cub. (I know the age only because the park rangers told me.) It amazes me that less than a mile from my house in a built-up area lives a bear and her cub. In fact, at night the duo visits our subdivision, checking to see what goodies may be hidden in the garbage bags of those residents who put their refuse out the night before collection. Ranger Frank pointed out that there were two highly unfortunate things about the mother bear. The first was that in her right ear was a red tag. That means she has been captured in some situation that put her disconcertingly close to humans. Too close for the comfort of the authorities who oversee such things. The second unfortunate thing was that in her left ear was a similar red tag, meaning that she was a repeat offender. There will be no third tag. With bears, as with baseball players, it’s three strikes and you’re out. The difference is that the baseball player will bat another time. A three-strikes bear will be euthanized. According to Ranger Frank, bears don’t respond well to relocation,
especially young ones. For one thing, it’s harder to forage for food in
unfamiliar territory. And the bear or bears in the new territory don’t
welcome a newcomer with open arms. At worst they’ll kill the
transplanted bear; more probably, they’ll harass it or drive it away. Since bears have an uncanny homing instinct, if the bear survives it will probably make the treacherous journey back to its familiar haunts. On the way, it will cross unfamiliar roads and encounter other potential hazards. And when it finally arrives back "home," it may soon get into trouble again and be captured. If it’s the third strike, it will have made the hazardous journey in vain. It was great fun to watch the bear. But with population growth and inevitable land development, it won’t be long before even the lucky few won’t be fortunate enough to have the experience I had on June 6. Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor
| |||
|
|
|