|
|||
|
|
|
|
Fine Prints: May, 2009 Commonsense or Sellout? May 2 Love=Confidence on Judgment Day 1 May 9 Love=Confidence on Judgment Day 2 May 16 Did You Know . . .? May 23 A Sane Estimate May 30
Commonsense or Sellout?
Recently an article was posted on the
Spectrummagazine.org blogsite that referred to an "unknown author around
150 C.E." The use of C. E. (which stands for "Common Era") on an
Adventist blogsite got one reader revved. "Am I the only Christian who isn’t
bending to the world, which wants to remove Christ from everything?" he
asked. "First it’s the Ten Commandments removed from schools and public
buildings, prayer and the Bible banned on school grounds, turning Merry
Christmas into Merry Xmas. Now, even ‘Christians’ show their loyalty to
the world instead of Christ by using this ridiculous ‘C.E.’ and ‘B.C.E.’
dating method instead of ‘Before Christ’ and ‘Year of Our Lord’— which
serves absolutely no purpose except to remove Christ yet again from our
society." Maybe. But maybe not. I responded: "I appreciate your
concern about the public disappearance of many symbols that are near and
dear to us as Christians. And often my first reaction, too, is to become
rather defensive. However, there may be another way to look at it. And
it goes like this: "Suppose some other religious
figure—one we’ll just make up—had eclipsed Jesus in terms of historical
impact. And, like Jesus, that figure claimed to be God in the flesh and
actually referred to himself as ‘God.’ So all dates would bear either a
B.G. (Before God) or an A.G. (After God) designation. "Since you and I believe in the
Father, Son and Holy Spirit of Christian doctrine, we certainly wouldn’t
see this other human as ‘God.’ An important historic figure, yes. But
God, no. So how would we like it if every time we wrote a paper for
history class we had to date events by calling someone God when we don’t
feel he actually is God? " . . . I understand how Jews,
Muslims, Hindus and others would be hesitant to say, ‘This happened x
number of years before the coming of the "Christ"’—when they don’t
believe he [Jesus] was the Christ. And I understand how those same
people would feel uncomfortable saying, ‘This happened in the year of
"our Lord"x’—when Jesus isn’t their Lord. "So we’ve come to a compromise. We
still use Jesus as the reference point—which in itself is quite a
tribute to His impact on our world—without having to use terms that
imply a belief or an allegiance that may not exist. "So I see it rather differently from
you. I see not using the B.C. and A.D. delineations as an example of the
Golden Rule truly being put into practice by Christians. I see it as an
act of courtesy and graciousness—Christlikeness—from Christians toward
those who don’t share our beliefs, just as I think the Golden Rule is
being put into practice when believers in Sunday don’t complain when I
mow my lawn on the day they consider holy but that I don’t. "I may be totally up the creek. But
it seems to me that taking steps not to impose on others even an implied
religious belief is an important value. So important that I think Jesus
himself would be proud of us for showing such sensitivity . . . ." Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor
Love=Confidence
on Judgment Day 1
Genesis 2:25 may seem a strange launching point for a discourse on
divine love. But bear with me. The writer of Genesis says of God’s freshly created male
and female human prototypes: "The man and his wife were both naked, and
they felt no shame" (Gen. 2:25). What an amazing description: Nothing to
hide. Total openness. No danger of being judged negatively. Unfortunately, this idyllic picture evaporates when the
original pair partake of the forbidden fruit. "Then the eyes of both of
them were opened," the Bible says, "and they realized they were naked;
so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves"
(Gen. 3:7). Remember, Adam and Eve had been naked from the
beginning. But with sin comes guilt and shame. They now face the
frightening specter of judgment. Not only have they questioned how much God truly loves
them by indulging in what he has forbidden, they now question whether
he’ll deal compassionately with them. They seek their own solution. Yet they recognize
immediately that the fig-leaf façades they’ve thrown together are
useless in restoring what they’ve lost. So they hide. We read: "Then the man and his wife heard the sound of
the Lord God as he was walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and
they hid from the Lord God among the trees of the garden" (Gen. 3:8). The promise of the serpent was that they could be like
God. The idea appealed. Why remain a mere human when a status so much
higher seems within reach? Having attempted to attain God-status, they
continue acting as if they’re God. Let’s see, they reason, if we were God, how
would we react if our created beings did what we’ve just done? And
realizing what they’d do, they dash for the woods. God finally coaxes the guilt-ridden, shame-filled couple
out of hiding and hears their confession about being afraid because of
their nakedness. His comment is instructive: "‘Who told you that you
were naked?’" (Gen. 3:11). I read his words to mean: "Am I chastising
you about your appearance? Have I complained?" Remember, God came to Adam and Eve as he always had. The
change was in them, not in him. They ran. He pursued. Their offspring
likewise have run ever since. He has continued to pursue. Relentlessly. Which brings us to why this story is such an appropriate
launching point for a discussion of divine love. The ultimate goal of
God’s love, in addition to securing our salvation eternally, is to
remove our fear—in the here and now. God wants to restore us to
something akin to the absolute sense of security that existed in Eden. In 1 John 4:16–18, we read: "God is love. Whoever lives
in love lives in God, and God in him. In this way, love is made complete
among us so that we will have confidence on the day of judgment, because
in this world we are like him. There is no fear in love. But perfect
love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one
who fears is not made perfect in love." Next week we’ll pursue this further. Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor
Love=Confidence on Judgment Day 2 Last week we talked about the alienation and fear that resulted from Adam and Eve’s sin in the Garden of Eden, noting that God doesn’t want us to remain alienated. He wants us to be confident in His love. God’s ultimate goal, in addition to securing our salvation eternally, is to remove our fear—in the here and now. God wants to restore us to something akin to the absolute sense of security that existed in Eden. In 1 John 4:16–18, we read: "God is love. Whoever lives in love lives in God, and God in him. In this way, love is made complete among us so that we will have confidence on the day of judgment, because in this world we are like him. There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love." The primary basis for this absence of fear is the love demonstrated by Jesus. Jesus showed that God is a God of grace, not of vengeance. When we look at the actions of Jesus, we glimpse the character of God (John 14:9). Jesus declared that the most dramatic manifestation of love is to die for one’s friends (John 15:13). But he went even further: he died for us while we were still his enemies (Romans 5:10). When we see Jesus saying to the woman caught in adultery, "Neither do I condemn you, go and leave your life of sin" (John 8:11); when we hear Jesus declare to Nicodemus that his objective is to save, not to condemn (John 3:17); when we hear Jesus promising that "whoever comes to me I will never drive away" (John 6:37); when we see Jesus praying for his persecutors, "Father forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing (Luke 23:34); when we encounter all of this and much, much, much more, we’re seeing practical, tangible and confidence-building evidences of the magnitude of God’s love for us. But I’d suggest there’s another aspect to how love banishes fear. Jesus commanded us to love one another (John 13:34,35). In fact, in much the same way that he was sent into the world to show what the Father is like, we’ve been given a similar assignment (John 17:18). But here’s the real challenge: John says we’ll have confidence to face God on the day of judgment "because in this world we are like him" (1 John 4:17, emphasis mine). It seems John is suggesting that demonstrations of divine love aren’t the sole basis for the Christian’s judgment-day confidence. It seems he’s saying also that when we as Christ’s followers are loving, caring, understanding, and non-condemnatory—when "we are like him"—the sense of safety and security that characterized Eden can to a great degree be restored "in this world." When Christ’s followers also demonstrate such God-like love, it’s not hard to believe God can and will accept us. Love’s ultimate goal isn’t
just about legal transactions. It’s about heart transformations and
relationships. It’s about absolute assurance of a divine Father who can
be trusted.
Did You
Know . . .?
Recently I reread a book called That’s a Fact,
Jack!, which one of my sons gave me for Christmas. I’m plagiarizing
here (in the authors’ actual words) some of the wisdom I gleaned: The largest human cell is the female ovum. The smallest is the male sperm. There are roughly 144,000 mosquitoes for every person on earth. Mosquito repellent doesn’t repel mosquitoes; it blocks their sensors so that they don’t know you are there. A fetus acquires fingerprints by the end of the first trimester. In 2003, the personal fortune of J. K. Rowling—best-selling British author of the wildly popular Harry Potter books—surpassed that of the Queen of England. Members of the U.S. Congress are the world’s highest paid legislators. The Spanish exclamation Ole!, commonly heard at bullfights and flamenco dances, comes from Allah, meaning "praise be to God." According to Guinness World Records, the Bible is the best-selling book of all time, with roughly 2.5 billion copies in distribution since 1815 in over 2,200 languages and dialects. The Bible is
the most shoplifted book in the world. Charlie
Chaplin once lost a Charlie Chaplin look-alike contest. He failed even
to make the finals. In late-1600s Puritan society, a child over 16 convicted of cursing at a parent was sentenced to death. Being a stubborn or rebellious child also earned you a death sentence. Percentage of American men who say they would marry the same woman if they had to do it all over again: 80%. Percentage of American women who say the same: 50%. On average, women utter 7,000 words a day; men manage just over 2,000. E T A O I N S H R D L U C M F G Y P W B V K X J Q Z: the alphabet in order of its frequency of use in written English. Skin is the body’s largest organ. An average adult’s skin weighs 8 to 10 pounds, making it two to three times as heavy as the brain. Over 100
Barbie dolls are sold on eBay every hour. Men who kiss their wives goodbye in the morning earn higher salaries than men who don’t. If the minimum wage had risen as fast as CEO pay since 1990, the lowest-paid workers in the United States would have earned $23.03 an hour in 2005. One ton of iron will produce a ton and a half of rust. A 2-inch
square of Velcro is strong enough to hang a 175-pound man from the
ceiling. You can tell the temperature by listening to a cricket chirp. For the temperature in degrees Fahrenheit, count the number of chirps in 15 seconds and then add 37. Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor
A Sane Estimate
During the past few weeks I’ve been using my days off to reroof my son
James’ house. The exercise has brought back a lot of memories. This was back in the days before air-powered nail guns
were ubiquitous. So all nailing was done by hand. No one could hold a
candle to Milton and Melvin Greenwood. Their ability to nail shingles
was truly impressive. I didn’t consider myself a slouch when it came to
roofing. Day in and day out, I could average one square (three bundles)
per hour. But the Greenwoods each consistently nailed three times as
many. And once when a storm was brewing and it was crucial to get the
roof under cover, they nailed six squares (18 bundles) each in just one
frenzied hour. My senior year in high school, I had a light load
because I’d taken extra classes during my first three years. On Fridays
the load was even lighter. Since I had only two Friday classes, and
since classes started at 7:00 am, I was done by 8:30. Fridays became
roofing days for the two-men-and-a-boy Greenwood construction crew. In those days, shingles weren’t placed on the roof when
delivered. We had to carry them up a ladder, bundle by bundle. And a
90-pound bundle of shingles, which is no small load even on the level,
seems a lot heavier when being hefted up a ladder. But Milton and Melvin were always in a hurry. And they
were strong. So they each carried two bundles up the ladder every time
they ascended to the roof. I could only stand back in awe at their
prowess. I clearly wasn’t in their league. Picking my way precariously up the ladder step by step,
I finally made it to the top and deposited my load onto the roof. There
was enough huffing and puffing that my employers definitely noticed what
I’d done. But they offered no word of surprise or commendation. Instead, they descended the ladder and each threw
three bundles of shingles (270 pounds) over his shoulder and headed
up the ladder—with dramatically more ease than I’d carried my 180-pound
load. In J.B. Phillips’ paraphrase of the New Testament, he
renders Romans 12:3 to say that everyone should "try to have a sane
estimate of your capabilities." I like that. I didn’t have James’ shingles deposited on his roof
because it would have cost $200 extra. But thanks in part to Phillips’
paraphrase—not to mention my age—I’m totally at peace with the idea that
I’ll never be more than a one-square-an-hour shingler and a
one-bundle-of-shingles-at-a-time pack mule! Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor | ||
|
|
|